Research PaperNO. 2026-ARCH-04

Hardware Management Architecture

Standardization of Out-of-Band Management for Hyperscale Infrastructure

Mean Fleet Attestation
98.24%
61,800 nodes
Avg IPC Latency (D-Bus)
12.05ms
95th percentile, 10ms
Protocol Version
REDFISH 1.18
DMTF Scalable Platforms
01.

The Challenge: Managing AI Infrastructure at Scale

As AI workloads drive unprecedented demand for GPU-dense infrastructure, neocloud providers face a fundamental challenge: how to manage thousands of heterogeneous servers with sub-second response times while maintaining security, reliability, and cost efficiency. Traditional enterprise management approaches built for hundreds of servers cannot scale to meet these demands.

Scale Requirements

  • 10,000+ nodes per cluster for large AI training runs
  • Sub-second telemetry for thermal management of 700W+ GPUs
  • Automated remediation without human intervention
  • Zero-trust security across all management interfaces

Current State

  • Fragmented vendor implementations (iDRAC, iLO, custom BMC)
  • Legacy IPMI protocols with known security vulnerabilities
  • Inconsistent Redfish API implementations across vendors
  • No standardized GPU telemetry integration
02.

Neocloud Pain Points

Neoclouds—the new generation of AI-focused cloud providers—face unique challenges that traditional enterprise hardware management solutions were never designed to address.

Vendor Lock-in & Proprietary APIs

Each server vendor implements proprietary BMC firmware with different feature sets, API behaviors, and licensing models. Building unified management across Dell, HPE, Supermicro, and ODM hardware requires significant engineering investment in vendor-specific adapters.

GPU-BMC Integration Gap

NVIDIA DCGM and GPU telemetry operate independently from BMC systems. There is no standard mechanism to expose GPU thermal data, power consumption, or error states through Redfish APIs, forcing operators to maintain parallel monitoring stacks.

Security & Attestation at Scale

Hardware attestation, firmware verification, and secure boot chains must operate across entire fleets. Legacy IPMI's lack of encryption and modern security features creates significant risk exposure in multi-tenant environments.

Provisioning Complexity

Bare-metal provisioning tools (Ironic, MAAS, Tinkerbell) each have different BMC integration requirements. Air-gapped deployments, common in enterprise AI, add additional complexity for firmware updates and configuration management.

03.

Relevant OCP Workstreams

The following OCP projects and sub-projects are actively working on specifications and contributions that address the challenges outlined in this research.

Hardware Management

View Project

Core project developing specifications for BMC interfaces, hardware management modules, and scalable infrastructure management.

Hardware Management ModuleHardware Fault ManagementScalable Cloud Infrastructure ManagementOpenRMC-DM

Open Platform Firmware

View Project

Developing open-source firmware specifications including UEFI/EDK2, Coreboot, and LinuxBoot for consistent boot environments.

Security

View Project

OCP S.A.F.E. program establishing security requirements for hardware attestation, secure boot, and supply chain verification.

OCP S.A.F.E. Program

Future Technologies Initiative

View Project

Forward-looking research including the Scaling AI Clusters at Neoclouds sub-project addressing next-generation management challenges.

Scaling AI Clusters at NeocloudsData Centric Computing
04.

OCP Specifications Summary

The following OCP specifications directly address the hardware management challenges facing neocloud operators. These specifications are developed collaboratively and are freely available for implementation.

SpecificationScopeStatusKey Benefit
OCP DC-MHSModular Hardware SystemAcceptedStandardized chassis/module interfaces
OCP HW Management ModuleBMC ArchitectureAcceptedRemovable BMC for independent upgrades
OCP Security ProfileS.A.F.E. RequirementsAcceptedHardware attestation baseline
OCP NIC 3.0Network InterfaceAcceptedStandardized NIC management interface
OpenRMC-DMRack ManagementDraftUnified rack-level controller spec
05.

OCP Contributions

The following contributions are available through the OCP Contributions portal. These include reference implementations, specifications, and design documents.

Hyperscale CPU RAS & Debug v0.7

Specification

Complete specification for CPU reliability, availability, and serviceability requirements for hyperscale environments.

Contributor: OCP Hardware Management ProjectView Contribution

DC-SCM 2.0 Specification

Hardware Specification

Data Center Secure Control Module specification for standardized BMC form factor and interfaces.

Contributor: OCP Hardware Management ProjectView Contribution

OCP RAS API v0.9 Final

API Specification

Standardized API for reliability, availability, and serviceability operations across OCP hardware.

Contributor: OCP Hardware Management ProjectView Contribution

View all contributions at opencompute.org/contributions